Ministry of Transport (MOT) and the Land Transport Authority (LTA) will extend the use of the current card-based ticketing (CBT) system for adult commuters, delaying the switch to SimplyGo following public feedback.
This comes almost two weeks after the announcement that non-SimplyGo cards cannot be used for public transport starting Jun. 1, 2024.
Minister for Transport Chee Hong Tat said in his Facebook post on Jan. 22 that MOT will spend an additional S$40 million so that commuters can continue to use their EZ Link cards and NETS FlashPay cards.
Chee also apologised on behalf of MOT and LTA for the delays commuters experienced when they tried to convert their existing EZ Link cards to SimplyGo.
"This could have been avoided with better preparation," he wrote.
Chee acknowledged the "concerns of commuters who want to continue seeing their fare deductions and card balances at fare gates and bus card readers".
SimplyGo benefits Chee said in his post that account-based ticketing (ABT) cards like SimplyGo and bank cards "have their benefits", citing an example of losing one's card.
If commuter loses their registered ABT card, the balance can be protected as the value is stored in the user's account, while if one loses their CBT card, the value stored in the card will be lost.
ABT also allows commuters to use their bank cards and mobile wallets to pay public transport fares.
Chee noted that ABT cards have grown more popular, with about 40 per cent of adult commuters now using bank cards or mobile wallets.
No technical solution to solve not displaying card balance Chee also pointed out that ABT cards do not store fares and card balance data in the card itself.
It would require a few seconds to retrieve the information from a backend system to display at fare gates and bus card readers.
"This would slow down the flow of commuters and cause long queues, especially during peak hours," he said.
He added that there are currently no technical solutions to this problem.
Chee said he tasked LTA to study ways to enhance the features and improve the user experience for ABT cards, specifically possible solutions for ABT cards to display fare deductions and stored value card balances.
My current Mission is keep wining until S_P 斗/close shop use main & sub method unit 1 unit= $20:
Use main bet as base the rest side bet to add on to max win or more Name it Eye jackpot system 南神眼
betting records at
http://forums.asianbookie.com/viewmessages.cfm?Forum=45&Topic=2112557
My current Mission is keep wining until S_P 斗/close shop use main & sub method unit 1 unit= $20:
Use main bet as base the rest side bet to add on to max win or more Name it Eye jackpot system 南神眼
betting records at
http://forums.asianbookie.com/viewmessages.cfm?Forum=45&Topic=2112557
Iswaran was born in 1962 in Chennai, later moving to Singapore.[4] Iswaran attended Saint Andrew's School and National Junior College[5] before graduating from the University of Adelaide with first class honours, where he read economics, of which was provided for by a Colombo Plan scholarship.[2] He also holds a Master of Public Administration from Harvard University.[6]
Iswaran was born in 1962 in Chennai, later moving to Singapore.[4] Iswaran attended Saint Andrew's School and National Junior College[5] before graduating from the University of Adelaide with first class honours, where he read economics, of which was provided for by a Colombo Plan scholarship.[2] He also holds a Master of Public Administration from Harvard University.[6]
5611 direct box very nices number must buy😋
Huat ah ah long
Tio liao eat lobster yu sheng for cny😂 Very cheap now $888 only
My current Mission is keep wining until S_P 斗/close shop use main & sub method unit 1 unit= $20:
Use main bet as base the rest side bet to add on to max win or more Name it Eye jackpot system 南神眼
betting records at
http://forums.asianbookie.com/viewmessages.cfm?Forum=45&Topic=2112557
chee hong tat ws involved in lta since 2020 years. He was appointed Senior Minister of State for Transport on 27 July 2020 and took up a concurrent appointment as Senior Minister of State for Finance on 13 June 2022.
chee hong tat need to let public knows how muc was spend on developting/testing simplygo till implementation.
guys this is what happen if our check and balances are not strong. Leong Mun Wai is doing a good job but look at how the pap ib espcecially tan chuan jin whack him.
"Margin of Safety" as the Central Concept of Betting A team's past ability to create quality chances is the expected number of goals that they should have produced. The expected number of goals in excess of the actual number of goals constitutes the "margin of safety". The margin is counted on to cushion the bettor against discomfiture in the event of a performance decline in the upcoming fixture. The soccer bettor does not expect the upcoming fixture to work out the same as in the past. If he were sure of that, the safety margin demanded might be small. The function of a safety margin is, in essence, that of rendering unnecessary an accurate estimate of the team's winning probability in the upcoming fixture. If the safety margin is sufficiently large, then it is enough to assume that the team's upcoming performance will not fall far below their expected goals in order for the bettor to feel sufficiently cushioned against bad luck. The safety margin is always dependent on the odds that the bettor accepts from the bookie. It will be large in certain odds, small at some lower odds, and negative when the odds is too low. However, even with a safety margin in the bettor's favour, he may lose his bet. For the margin guarantees only that he has a better chance of winning - not that loss is impossible. Theory of Diversification There is a close logical connection between the concept of safety margin and the principle of diversification. One is correlative with the other. Even with a margin in the bettor’s favor, an individual bet may work out badly. But as the number of such commitments is increased the more certain does it become that the aggregate of the profits will exceed the aggregate of the losses. This point may be made more colorful by a reference to the arithmetic of roulette. If a man bets $1 on a single number, he is paid $35 profit when he wins—but the chances are 37 to 1 that he will lose. He has a “negative margin of safety.” In his case diversification is foolish. The more numbers he bets on, the smaller his chance of ending with a profit. If he regularly bets $1 on every number (including 0 and 00), he is certain to lose $2 on each turn of the wheel. But suppose the winner received $39 profit instead of $35. Then he would have a small but important margin of safety. Therefore, the more numbers he wagers on, the better his chance of gain. And he could be certain of winning $2 on every spin by simply betting $1 each on all the numbers. (Incidentally, the two examples given actually describe the respective positions of the player and proprietor of a wheel with a 0 and 00.)
"Margin of Safety" as the Central Concept of Betting A team's past ability to create quality chances is the expected number of goals that they should have produced. The expected number of goals in excess of the actual number of goals constitutes the "margin of safety". The margin is counted on to cushion the bettor against discomfiture in the event of a performance decline in the upcoming fixture. The soccer bettor does not expect the upcoming fixture to work out the same as in the past. If he were sure of that, the safety margin demanded might be small. The function of a safety margin is, in essence, that of rendering unnecessary an accurate estimate of the team's winning probability in the upcoming fixture. If the safety margin is sufficiently large, then it is enough to assume that the team's upcoming performance will not fall far below their expected goals in order for the bettor to feel sufficiently cushioned against bad luck. The safety margin is always dependent on the odds that the bettor accepts from the bookie. It will be large in certain odds, small at some lower odds, and negative when the odds is too low. However, even with a safety margin in the bettor's favour, he may lose his bet. For the margin guarantees only that he has a better chance of winning - not that loss is impossible. Theory of Diversification There is a close logical connection between the concept of safety margin and the principle of diversification. One is correlative with the other. Even with a margin in the bettor’s favor, an individual bet may work out badly. But as the number of such commitments is increased the more certain does it become that the aggregate of the profits will exceed the aggregate of the losses. This point may be made more colorful by a reference to the arithmetic of roulette. If a man bets $1 on a single number, he is paid $35 profit when he wins—but the chances are 37 to 1 that he will lose. He has a “negative margin of safety.” In his case diversification is foolish. The more numbers he bets on, the smaller his chance of ending with a profit. If he regularly bets $1 on every number (including 0 and 00), he is certain to lose $2 on each turn of the wheel. But suppose the winner received $39 profit instead of $35. Then he would have a small but important margin of safety. Therefore, the more numbers he wagers on, the better his chance of gain. And he could be certain of winning $2 on every spin by simply betting $1 each on all the numbers. (Incidentally, the two examples given actually describe the respective positions of the player and proprietor of a wheel with a 0 and 00.)
"Margin of Safety" as the Central Concept of Betting A team's past ability to create quality chances is the expected number of goals that they should have produced. The expected number of goals in excess of the actual number of goals constitutes the "margin of safety". The margin is counted on to cushion the bettor against discomfiture in the event of a performance decline in the upcoming fixture. The soccer bettor does not expect the upcoming fixture to work out the same as in the past. If he were sure of that, the safety margin demanded might be small. The function of a safety margin is, in essence, that of rendering unnecessary an accurate estimate of the team's winning probability in the upcoming fixture. If the safety margin is sufficiently large, then it is enough to assume that the team's upcoming performance will not fall far below their expected goals in order for the bettor to feel sufficiently cushioned against bad luck. The safety margin is always dependent on the odds that the bettor accepts from the bookie. It will be large in certain odds, small at some lower odds, and negative when the odds is too low. However, even with a safety margin in the bettor's favour, he may lose his bet. For the margin guarantees only that he has a better chance of winning - not that loss is impossible. Theory of Diversification There is a close logical connection between the concept of safety margin and the principle of diversification. One is correlative with the other. Even with a margin in the bettor’s favor, an individual bet may work out badly. But as the number of such commitments is increased the more certain does it become that the aggregate of the profits will exceed the aggregate of the losses. This point may be made more colorful by a reference to the arithmetic of roulette. If a man bets $1 on a single number, he is paid $35 profit when he wins—but the chances are 37 to 1 that he will lose. He has a “negative margin of safety.” In his case diversification is foolish. The more numbers he bets on, the smaller his chance of ending with a profit. If he regularly bets $1 on every number (including 0 and 00), he is certain to lose $2 on each turn of the wheel. But suppose the winner received $39 profit instead of $35. Then he would have a small but important margin of safety. Therefore, the more numbers he wagers on, the better his chance of gain. And he could be certain of winning $2 on every spin by simply betting $1 each on all the numbers. (Incidentally, the two examples given actually describe the respective positions of the player and proprietor of a wheel with a 0 and 00.)
chee hong tat need to let public knows how muc was spend on developting/testing simplygo till implementation.
guys this is what happen if our check and balances are not strong. Leong Mun Wai is doing a good job but look at how the pap ib espcecially tan chuan jin whack him.
Yes its so obvious the oppo always gets bullied they clapped they laugh so childish
Please disable your advertisement blocker!
Sila mematikan Penyekat iklan anda!
请禁用您的广告拦截！
Hãy vô hiệu hóa chặn quảng cáo của bạn!
โปรดปิดใช้งานการป้องกันการโฆษณาของคุณ
ကျေးဇူးပြု၍ သင့်ကြော်ငြာပိတ်ဆို့ခြင်းကို ပိတ်ပါ။
광고 차단기를 비활성화하십시오!
Main Menu >
Gossip Corner >
SimplyGo tio kan by elderlies - Chee Hong Tat apologises
[ 278 Chatters Online
]
1
Find all Topics Started by LONGSTER
Find all Posts by LONGSTER
Follow / Unfollow
PM LONGSTER
23-Jan 2024 Tuesday
2:59 PM (96 days ago)
2 Likes
Like
quote originally posted by seelangui:
